quantum whatever

Over the last few weeks there has been a surfeit of television programmes on TV analysing how the universe began, how we exist within it and how it will eventually end.

Fascinating.

Except for one small thing.  I don’t understand a single word being spoken by the theoretical physicists who appear in these documentaries.  I can’t grasp the events they are trying to relay or in any way comprehend what the blazes is going on.  I can’t be alone in this, surely?

One thing I do understand though is that whenever physicists are going on about something they don’t understand it always has a sinister name like dark matter, black holes or dark energy.  It’s not because these things are in fact dark (or black) but because they are unknown.  It should just be called the dark universe and be done with it if you ask me.

One thing I do like though is the beautiful equations on view.  I say beautiful because they really are works of art.  I’d happily hang one on my wall along with the other pictures I’ve got who’s meaning I don’t understand.  They all stick to the same pattern though if you’ve noticed:

1      a complex mathematical formula
2      a picture of a planet with an elliptical orbit around its sun
3      more maths
4      perhaps a graph, no definitely a graph plotting something against time usually
5      even more maths
6      a fiery diagram of an imploding sun perhaps
7      the last bit of maths.

Oh yeah.  There’s never an equals sign strangely.


 ummmmm, is the answer 6 sir?

Now, I’ve got an A’level in pure mathematics and these things mean nothing to me.  And, I suspect, mean nothing to the people who wrote them or indeed to those who over- enthusiastically mull over them with their bad hair and strange jumpers.

It’s all a load of bunkum.  Quantum bunkum yes.  But bunkum.


Oh.  And don’t call me Shirley.

Comments

  1. I watched a show that put forth the question "Is Math 'invented' or 'real'?" I watched the whole hour and they still never answered the question! I only understood about half of it.....but I still think math is totally made up to make the physicists look smarter than us!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I too have a pure maths A Level, which I only remembered yesterday, when I was listening to a programme on the radio about the smallest particles yet discovered. As my brain struggled to absorb the information (tired brain - it was very early in the morning), I felt like I was digging through a very (very) old box of treasures and finding things I'd totally forgotten I had. A sudden memory of a physics lesson, a 'tada' moment of understanding. Then I reached my destination (I was in my car). And now, a day later? Can't remember a thing! Sigh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It seems to me that everything to do with the obscure side of physics, be it the astro, nuclear or quantum variant, is carried out by researchers in research labs, i.e. they are looking for an outcome to a very vague question and really haven't got a clue to the definitive answer. Either there are a lot of very highly qualified, highly paid researchers out there doing a great job or we are surrounded by some very clever bluffers?????

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts